John Deacon Cognitive Systems. Structured Insight. Aligned Futures.

LATED Framework: Why Stories Lose the Room Without Context

The dif­fer­ence between a sto­ry that lands and one that los­es the room often comes down to tex­ture. You can feel when the bones are there but the body is not, when key details fall out and mean­ing fails to trans­fer.

The cost of missing context

You can feel it when a sto­ry slips: the out­line is cor­rect, but the moment nev­er arrives. Key details fall out. We over-index on what hap­pened and skip where and how it hap­pened, what it felt like, and what was actu­al­ly said. The result is a thin report. The lis­ten­er can­not recre­ate the scene, and the mean­ing does not trans­fer.

A work­able fix needs to be sim­ple enough to use under pres­sure and com­plete enough to hold a mem­o­ry’s shape. The LATED frame­work, Loca­tion, Action, Thoughts, Emo­tions, Dia­logue, meets that mark. This rep­re­sents more than a sto­ry­telling trick. Treat­ed as a cog­ni­tive scaf­fold, it helps encode and retrieve episod­ic mem­o­ries by col­lect­ing the con­crete ele­ments that make an expe­ri­ence real. That con­crete­ness is what most plot-heavy sum­maries miss.

You are refin­ing your abil­i­ty to deliv­er val­ue that actu­al­ly con­nects, rather than chas­ing orna­ment. The more you can reli­ably sur­face place, sequence, inner stance, felt state, and speech, the more your account can car­ry weight with­out get­ting lost in abstrac­tion. LATED is built to close that gap.

LATED as a cognitive scaffold

A cog­ni­tive scaf­fold is a sim­ple exter­nal struc­ture that sup­ports men­tal work, mem­o­ry recall, rea­son­ing, or con­struc­tion of a nar­ra­tive. LATED does this by giv­ing you five anchors that map to how we store and con­jure events:

  • Loca­tion: the where and when that sit­u­ates every­thing else.
  • Action: vis­i­ble behav­ior in sequence, what hap­pened.
  • Thoughts: what you believed or con­clud­ed in the moment.
  • Emo­tions: the felt sig­nals rid­ing along­side action and thought.
  • Dia­logue: the words said out loud, quot­ed or para­phrased.

Used togeth­er, they sta­bi­lize mem­o­ry retrieval and make retellings usable. The claim here is prac­ti­cal: for embod­ied expe­ri­ence, LATED gen­er­al­ly cap­tures more of what gives an event mean­ing than pure­ly plot-dri­ven struc­tures. Con­fi­dence is high for that claim with­in the domain of con­crete episodes.

Nar­ra­tive ground­ing is the goal: spe­cif­ic, con­crete detail that pre­vents abstrac­tion from car­ry­ing the day.

This also mat­ters for sys­tems that gen­er­ate text. As a prompt­ing struc­ture for AI, LATED can mit­i­gate gener­ic out­put by forc­ing speci­fici­ty across mul­ti­ple chan­nels. When the mod­el is asked to include each ele­ment, the nar­ra­tive tends to stay ground­ed rather than drift­ing into vague sum­ma­ry.

The five parts in practice

You do not need long para­graphs for each let­ter. You need enough detail to anchor the moment with­out drown­ing it. A quick pass for each com­po­nent usu­al­ly suf­fices.

Location
  • Pin the scene to a time and place. One or two con­crete cues are enough to ori­ent the lis­ten­er.
  • Field note: loca­tion can be phys­i­cal or sit­u­a­tion­al.
Action
  • List the key moves in order. Keep verbs strong and sim­ple. Avoid side quests.
  • Pat­tern: three beats often car­ry most sit­u­a­tions, set­up, move, out­come.
Thoughts
  • Cap­ture the belief or inter­pre­ta­tion run­ning at the time, rather than the pol­ished con­clu­sion after the fact.
  • Label clear­ly to sep­a­rate inner stance from observ­able facts.
Emotions
  • Name the felt state briefly. You are pro­vid­ing the sig­nal traf­fic that shaped choic­es.
  • Pair­ing emo­tion with action often clar­i­fies why a deci­sion looked off or brave.
Dialogue
  • Pull one or two lines that changed direc­tion or revealed intent. Quote or para­phrase.
  • Dia­logue serves as a hinge. Use it to show turns, rather than rehash­ing the whole exchange.

LATED asks you to touch each anchor so the scene has a spine. Then you trim. If a com­po­nent adds noth­ing to the plot or les­son, keep it light.

Coun­ter­point mat­ters here. LATED is opti­mized for recall­ing and recount­ing spe­cif­ic, bound­ed events. This approach proves less effec­tive for com­plex argu­ments or long his­tor­i­cal arcs. You can still use it to cap­ture piv­otal moments with­in those larg­er nar­ra­tives, but avoid forc­ing it into becom­ing a full doc­trine for every kind of writ­ing.

Reading the weighting

Every sto­ry­teller leans some­where. The dis­tri­b­u­tion of atten­tion across Loca­tion, Action, Thoughts, Emo­tions, and Dia­logue, your com­po­nent weight­ing, acts like a nar­ra­tive fin­ger­print. Pat­terns show up:

  • Action-heavy, emo­tion-light: effi­cient but dry; use­ful for check­lists and after-action reports, thin for teach­ing nuance.
  • Thought-dom­i­nant: strong on log­ic and self-expla­na­tion, prone to ratio­nal­iz­ing in hind­sight if kept hon­est.
  • Emo­tion-for­ward: com­pelling, but can blur causal­i­ty if unmoored from sequence and speech.
  • Dia­logue-cen­tric: vivid, but con­text can van­ish if Loca­tion and Thought are absent.

As a diag­nos­tic sig­nal, habit­u­al weight­ing sug­gests cog­ni­tive and com­mu­ni­ca­tion bias. This serves as a mir­ror. If your sto­ries rou­tine­ly skip Dia­logue, you may be avoid­ing inter­per­son­al fric­tion. If Loca­tion is always vague, you may be abstract­ing too ear­ly. Use the sig­nal to rebal­ance.

A prac­ti­cal move: set a min­i­mum viable pass. Before clos­ing a write-up or debrief, scan for each com­po­nent:

  • Did I sit­u­ate the moment?
  • Did I mark the key moves?
  • Did I note my in-the-moment stance?
  • Did I name the felt sig­nal?
  • Did I include the hinge words?

Two cau­tions keep the weight­ing hon­est:

  • Thoughts and Emo­tions are sub­jec­tive. In con­texts that require strict objec­tiv­i­ty, label them and sep­a­rate them from observ­able facts.
  • Over­fill­ing any sin­gle com­po­nent pro­duces noise. Inte­gra­tion beats vol­ume.

Field uses and choosing the right tool

Orga­ni­za­tion­al knowl­edge

  • Project debriefs: Struc­ture the first draft around LATED to cap­ture what actu­al­ly hap­pened, then dis­till into rec­om­men­da­tions. This helps pre­vent san­i­tized sum­maries that lose the turn­ing points.
  • Inci­dent reviews: Use LATED to recon­struct piv­otal episodes inside a broad­er time­line. Keep Thoughts and Emo­tions labeled, so you can dis­tin­guish sig­nal from spec­u­la­tion.
  • Knowl­edge cap­ture: Ask con­trib­u­tors to log short LATED snap­shots dur­ing work, rather than weeks lat­er. Fresh details fade; scaf­fold­ing helps pre­serve them.

Human–AI co-cre­ation

  • Prompt tem­plate: Write a nar­ra­tive that includes spe­cif­ic Loca­tion cues, a clear sequence of Action beats, in-the-moment Thoughts, named Emo­tions, and at least two lines of Dia­logue that turn the scene. This tends to curb gener­ic prose.
  • Diag­nos­tic prompts: Ask the mod­el to ana­lyze weight­ing after gen­er­a­tion: Which LATED com­po­nents dom­i­nat­ed? What is miss­ing? Then iter­ate.

Select­ing the right scaf­fold

  • LATED vs. STAR: STAR excels at accom­plish­ment report­ing. It com­press­es out­comes. LATED, by con­trast, aims at embod­ied, gran­u­lar expe­ri­ence. Choose LATED when the les­son lives in the tex­ture of the moment; choose STAR when you need crisp proof of impact.
  • LATED vs. the Hero’s Jour­ney: The Hero’s Jour­ney maps arche­typ­al arcs. LATED serves as a scene engine. Use it to cap­ture the episodes that make an arc real.

Lim­its and mit­i­ga­tions

  • Risk: Over­ly descrip­tive, frag­ment­ed accounts. Mit­i­ga­tion: inte­grate com­po­nents into a sin­gle through­line; treat LATED as cap­ture first, edit sec­ond.
  • Risk: Mis­use in ana­lyt­i­cal writ­ing. Mit­i­ga­tion: deploy LATED to col­lect episodes, then switch to argu­ment struc­tures for syn­the­sis.
  • Risk: Incon­sis­ten­cy around Thoughts and Emo­tions in for­mal con­texts. Mit­i­ga­tion: label sub­jec­tiv­i­ty; main­tain a clean line between observed and inferred.

What makes sto­ries trav­el is speci­fici­ty, not vol­ume.

LAT­ED’s strength lies in its prac­ti­cal­i­ty: it gives non-writ­ers, busy teams, and even machines a way to keep the scene intact. Use it to cap­ture the moment. Then cut to the part that car­ries for­ward.

Prompt Guide

Copy and paste this prompt with Chat­G­PT and Mem­o­ry or your favorite AI assis­tant that has rel­e­vant con­text about you.

Recall a recent work con­ver­sa­tion that changed direc­tion unex­pect­ed­ly. Use the LATED frame­work to recon­struct it: Where were you (Loca­tion)? What hap­pened in sequence (Action)? What were you think­ing in the moment (Thoughts)? How did it feel (Emo­tions)? What spe­cif­ic words were said that shift­ed things (Dia­logue)?

About the author

John Deacon

An independent AI researcher and systems practitioner focused on semantic models of cognition and strategic logic. He developed the Core Alignment Model (CAM) and XEMATIX, a cognitive software framework designed to translate strategic reasoning into executable logic and structure. His work explores the intersection of language, design, and decision systems to support scalable alignment between human intent and digital execution.

Read more at bio.johndeacon.co.za or join the email list in the menu to receive one exclusive article each week.

John Deacon Cognitive Systems. Structured Insight. Aligned Futures.

Categories