John Deacon Cognitive Systems. Structured Insight. Aligned Futures.

Sensory flattening: how screens steal depth and how to get it back

We live in a time when almost anything can be known from a distance, yet the more we learn this way, the thinner life can feel. This isn't nostalgia; it's a practical question about how knowledge changes when it's mediated by names, images, and screens, and how to get the missing depth back.

Face the trade-off

Before we fix anything, we need to see the cost clearly. There are two ways of knowing: you can know through a thing by meeting it, or know about a thing by reading, watching, or hearing a summary. Both matter, but they're not the same. A trail guide tells you the mileage and elevation; the hike tells you where your lungs burn, where the wind cuts, and where the light opens the valley.

Try this on a weeknight: you watch a 10‑minute video recipe for sourdough and it “clicks.” The next morning, your dough sticks to the counter, slumps in the oven, and tastes flat. The video was information; the loaf is experience. The difference is the feel of the dough under your palm, the part you can't download.

Notice how naming flattens

From that trade-off, the next move is naming. When we name something, we turn a living experience into a category. That helps us talk, plan, and coordinate, but it narrows the field. A name acts like a semantic anchor: it holds the object in place inside our mind, while much of its motion, its presence, slides out of view.

Walk past a small bird and think “sparrow, ” and you're done. But stop for thirty seconds and you'll see the soft brown mottling, the staccato head-tilts, the sudden freeze when a shadow crosses. The category “sparrow” is useful; it is not the bird. The label lightens memory and communication by shaving off texture.

This is the quiet trade inside language: every definition buys clarity and sells mystery.

That sale becomes expensive in a world built on screens, where images and names move faster than anything you can touch.

See the screen habit

If naming is a habit, screens are the gym where it gets stronger. On a phone, appearances are optimized and compressed. A perfect photo of an old oak shows bark lines and leaf color, but not the weight of silence under its crown, the damp soil smell after rain, or how your shoulders drop when you stand there. The image is an imitation of presence that travels well and lives thin.

Consider two mornings. In one, you check the weather app, 72°F, light breeze, and head out. In the other, you step outside first. You feel the cool on your forearms, hear a trash truck two blocks away, catch the faint sweetness of a neighbor's jasmine. Both mornings take the same minutes; only one tunes your nervous system to the world you'll walk through.

Screens aren't the villain; they're accelerators of a pattern: knowing about replaces knowing through. To change the pattern, you need a small, repeatable way to put your body back in the loop.

Try a presence protocol

So what do you do when life feels thin? You add friction in the right place and let your senses repopulate your map. Use this short protocol once a day for a week, ideally in a place you already frequent, a park bench, a bus stop, a quiet corner at home. Keep it under five minutes.

  1. Pick one object in reach (a mug, a tree, a railing). Name it once, silently, then drop the name.
  2. Scan with five senses in slow order, sight, sound, touch, smell, then back to sight, finding one concrete detail per sense.
  3. Shift from object to field: notice how light, air, and background noise form a single scene.
  4. End by checking your body: jaw, shoulders, breath, one small release.

Here's how it looks at a city bus stop. You pick the metal pole, call it “pole, ” then stop calling it anything. You see a scratch that looks like a tiny river delta, feel the cool tack of old tape glue with your thumb, catch a diesel note from a bus rounding the corner, and notice the low rumble underfoot before you hear the brakes. After a minute, your breath drops from your chest to your belly. That's presence doing quiet maintenance.

Rebuild an honest self

With a bit of presence on board, you're better equipped for the trickiest layer: looking at yourself without turning into a picture of yourself. As you age, it's common to feel what stays constant even as everything else moves, the part of you that recognizes you. That's a kind of wisdom. But reflection can backfire when you start editing the self to match a preferred image. You end up managing a brand, not meeting a person.

Try an everyday check that avoids the mirror trap. After a hard meeting, don't ask “Why am I always like this?” (That calls the category.) Ask, “Where is the tension right now?” and “What just changed when I named it?” You might find your tongue pressed against your teeth, or your hands balled up. Then you step outside for two minutes and run the presence protocol on a nearby tree or the texture of a brick wall.

The point isn't to analyze faster; it's to contact what's real, then decide.

Over time, you'll see patterns: the colleague who always spikes your pulse, the late‑night scrolling that leaves you oddly restless, the afternoon walk that brings your focus back online. You're not chasing a perfect self; you're tuning your actions to a clearer signal.

Your life is richer when names serve experience, not the other way around. Start by noticing where you rely on the image and where you still feel the thing itself. Choose a single routine moment today, making coffee, stepping outside, or waiting for a call, and run the four‑step presence protocol. Do it for seven days. If your world feels thicker and your choices steadier, keep it; if not, adjust the when or where and try again.

Here's a thought…

Pick one object within reach. Name it once, then drop the name. Spend two minutes scanning it with all five senses, finding one concrete detail per sense.

About the author

John Deacon

Independent AI research and systems practitioner focused on semantic models of cognition and strategic logic. He developed the Core Alignment Model (CAM) and XEMATIX, a cognitive software framework designed to translate strategic reasoning into executable logic and structure. His work explores the intersection of language, design, and decision systems to support scalable alignment between human intent and digital execution.

This article was composed using the Cognitive Publishing Pipeline
More info at bio.johndeacon.co.za

John Deacon Cognitive Systems. Structured Insight. Aligned Futures.

Categories