Managing Context in Real-Time AI Retrieval with Semantic Embeddings

When building a large contextual database for real-time AI retrieval, using semantic embeddings can greatly simplify managing nuanced context. However, directly reading and writing to embeddings comes with important considerations that influence practicality and feasibility. Here’s an analysis of the key aspects:

1. Can You Directly Read and Write Semantic Embeddings?

You can directly write to and retrieve embeddings stored in a database, but only under specific circumstances. Here’s what you need to understand:

Reading Embeddings

Direct Retrieval:
You can directly retrieve semantic embeddings from your vector database for use in similarity searches or downstream tasks.
For example, querying a vector database (e.g., Pinecone, Weaviate, FAISS):

vector = vector_db.get_vector(object_id="12345")

This is straightforward because embeddings are just arrays of floats stored in a database.
Usage:
These embeddings are often used “as-is” for similarity searches or alignment tasks but are not inherently interpretable by humans.

Writing to Embeddings

Direct Updates:
You cannot “manually” modify semantic embeddings because they are generated by neural networks, encoding relationships that depend on the underlying model’s learned structure.
Instead, to revise an object:
Update the raw data or attributes (e.g., CAM layers or metadata).
Reprocess the updated data through the embedding model to generate a new embedding.
Replace the old embedding with the new one in your vector database:

updated_vector = embedding_model.encode(updated_object)
vector_db.update_vector(object_id="12345", embedding=updated_vector)

2. Why Directly Modifying Embeddings Is Not Practical

Non-Interpretable Nature:

Embeddings are high-dimensional vectors (e.g., 768 or 1,536 dimensions), making it impractical to manually adjust them while maintaining semantic coherence.

Dependence on the Embedding Model:

The meaning encoded in embeddings is derived from the specific architecture and training of the model (e.g., OpenAI embeddings, Sentence-BERT).
Modifying raw embeddings could break the semantic integrity of the vector space.

Consistency in Context:

Any direct modification to embeddings could create inconsistencies in retrieval, as the relationships between embeddings depend on their position in the vector space.

3. Recommended Workflow for Revising Objects

To maintain nuanced context while ensuring the semantic integrity of embeddings, follow this indirect workflow:

Step 1: Retrieve the Object

Retrieve the original object (e.g., CAM observation, ALO) and associated metadata.

object_data = database.get_object(object_id="12345")

Step 2: Edit the Attributes

Allow revisions to the object’s attributes (e.g., CAM layer descriptions, feedback).

updated_object = object_data
updated_object["cam_layers"]["vision"]["description"] = "New vision description"

Step 3: Regenerate the Embedding

Use the embedding model to regenerate the semantic embedding for the updated object.

updated_embedding = embedding_model.encode(updated_object)

Step 4: Update the Database

Replace the old embedding and attributes in the database with the revised data.

vector_db.update_vector(object_id="12345", embedding=updated_embedding)
database.update_object(object_id="12345", data=updated_object)

4. Why Work with Semantic Embeddings for Context Management?

Semantic embeddings are highly effective for managing nuanced context because:

Efficient Retrieval:

Embeddings enable fast, approximate similarity searches using tools like k‑Nearest Neighbors (k‑NN).
This is especially useful for querying related contexts or objects in real time.

Scalability:

Embeddings scale well with increasing database size, as they simplify searches into distance calculations (e.g., cosine similarity).

Generalization:

Embeddings capture semantic relationships, enabling robust retrieval even for unseen or slightly modified queries.

5. Best Practices for Working with Embeddings

To optimize real-time AI retrieval while maintaining the ability to revise objects:

Use a Two-Layer Storage System:

Relational/Document Database: Store structured objects (e.g., CAM observations, ALOs).
Vector Database: Store embeddings for efficient similarity searches.
Both layers are linked via a unique identifier (e.g., object_id).

Avoid Manual Embedding Edits:

Always revise the original object and regenerate embeddings to ensure semantic consistency.

Keep Track of Versions:

Maintain a version history for objects and embeddings, allowing you to track changes and revert if needed.

Batch Updates:

For large-scale revisions, update embeddings in batches to reduce computational overhead.

Regular Retraining:

If the underlying context or use case evolves significantly, consider retraining or fine-tuning the embedding model.

Closing note

While you can read and write embeddings, directly modifying them is not practical or recommended.
Instead, revise objects (e.g., CAM observations) and regenerate their embeddings using the model to ensure semantic coherence.
This workflow ensures efficient, scalable, and accurate management of nuanced context in a real-time AI retrieval system.

John Deacon

John is a researcher and practitioner committed to building aligned, authentic digital representations. Drawing from experience in digital design, systems thinking, and strategic development, John brings a unique ability to bridge technical precision with creative vision, solving complex challenges in situational dynamics with aims set at performance outcomes.

View all posts