Analysis of ‘Facts Are Facts’ by Benjamin H. Freedman – Khazar Reference

The book “Facts Are Facts” by Benjamin H. Freedman presents an argument centered on the historical and linguistic evolution of the term “Jew,” the identity of Jesus, and the concept of the lost tribes of Israel. Below is a breakdown of the key arguments and conclusions drawn:

Arguments

1. The Term “Jew”:

   • Freedman argues that the word “Jew” did not exist in any language before the 18th century. The term emerged as a corrupted and contracted form of the Latin “Iudaeus” and the Greek “Ioudaios,” which referred to Judeans, the inhabitants of Judea, a geographical region.
   • The modern understanding of “Jew” as referring to a religious, racial, or cultural identity is a “secondary meaning” created through centuries of misrepresentation and deliberate reinterpretation.
     

2. Jesus’ Identity:

   • Freedman claims that Jesus was not a “Jew” in the modern sense. During His lifetime, He was referred to as a “Judean,” which identified Him geographically rather than religiously.
   • He asserts that Jesus opposed the religious practices of the Pharisees, which later evolved into what is known today as “Judaism.” Freedman argues that labeling Jesus as a “Jew” conflates His teachings with practices He actively criticized.
     

3. The Lost Tribes of Israel:

   • The book explores the idea of the ten “lost tribes” of Israel, suggesting they were dispersed and assimilated into other cultures. Freedman argues that the modern Jewish population, predominantly descended from the Khazars (a Turkic people who converted to Judaism in the 8th century), is not directly related to the ancient Israelites.
   • He challenges the belief that modern Jews are the lineal descendants of the Israelites, contending that this misconception has been perpetuated for political and theological reasons.

Conclusions

1. Historical Misrepresentation:

   • The term “Jew” has been historically misunderstood and misrepresented, leading to widespread theological and cultural confusion. Freedman emphasizes the need to differentiate between Judeans of Jesus' time and the modern Jewish identity.
     

2. Jesus as a Judean, Not a Jew:

   • Jesus should be identified as a Judean rather than a Jew in the contemporary sense. His teachings were in opposition to the Pharisaic traditions that became the foundation of modern Judaism.
     

3. The Khazar Theory:

   • Modern Jews, particularly Ashkenazi Jews, are argued to be primarily descended from the Khazars rather than the Israelites. Freedman presents this as evidence that the Jewish identity has more recent and geographically diverse origins than is often believed.
     

4. Call for Clarity and Truth:

   • Freedman urges scholars, clergy, and the public to reassess their understanding of religious and historical narratives. He advocates for a return to “truth” in discussions about the origins of religious traditions, Jesus’ identity, and the lineage of modern Jews.

Key Implications

• The book challenges mainstream theological and historical narratives about Jewish identity and the roots of Christianity.
• It posits that misconceptions about the term “Jew” and the identity of Jesus have significant implications for interfaith relations, historical scholarship, and cultural understanding.

These arguments and conclusions reflect Freedman’s perspective, and they have been the subject of debate and criticism, particularly regarding the Khazar theory and its implications.